Japan Cricket Rating - How did we do it ?


How did we calculate the Rating?

As with every other cricket rating system, you may find many drawbacks here too. We welcome your suggestions and feedbacks to improve this system.

While creating the Rating, we considered the following aspects of the Japan Cricket:

  1. Cricket is only a weekend sport played by otherwise employed people, not professionals
  2. At times, clubs are unable to field a full eleven
  3. Even if they do, there are occasions where it may not be their strongest team, resulting in a lower ranking team defeating a higher ranked team quite often
  4. It is difficult glean information about the friendly matches, which, unlike the KCL, are not officially reported anywhere except on the individual club's website

With those constraints in mind, we came up with the following criteria to decide a Performance Index(PI).

Beginning 2006, we have adopted a new calculation method taking into consideration all the feedback we received during the past one year. We thank you for all those valuable support and feedback!

The major changes are:

Click here for a description of the old method. 

Simple Performance Index (SPI)

SPI is the points a team gains for their victory or tie.

Win - 3 points
Tie - 1 point

Tournament Performance Index (TPI)

Any team that earns a berth in the semi-final of a tournament consisting of three teams or more will get 2 bonus points. Further, the teams that get into the final will get an additional 2 points.

TPI - 2 points

Weighted Performance Index (WPI)

Any team that beats a higher ranking team will get bonus points equal to 0.25 times the ranking difference. For e.g. if a team ranked 10 beats a team ranked 5, the winner will get a bonus point of 1.25.

WPI - 0.25 times the ranking difference.

In order to apply this changes, we used the KCL results of 2005 as a base and applied the SPI and TPI but omitted the WPI for obvious reasons. The ranking table thus obtained is given below. Please note that the WPI will be applied to all results from 2006.

Yes, we are expecting a few howling from the teams who have lost their higher ranking  due to the new calculations but please bear with us.

                                        Table A - Ranking as of Dec. 31, 2005
Ranking Team Played Won Tie Bonus
Pts
Points Pt/Pl
1 Tokyo Wombats 10 6 1 4 23 2.300
2 Millennium 7 4 4 16 2.286
3 YC&AC 12 8 2 26 2.167
4 Wyverns 9 5 4 19 2.111
5 Shizuoka Kytes 15 9 4 31 2.067
6 Ichihara Sharks 9 6 18 2.000
7 Fuji Far East 9 5 2 17 1.889
8 Indian Engineers 14 8 2 26 1.857
9 Tokyo Dragons 14 8 2 26 1.857
10 Adore 9 5 15 1.667
11 Friends 6 3 9 1.500
12 Nagoya 10 5 15 1.500
13 Tokyo Bay 9 4 12 1.333
14 Tokyo Giants 10 4 12 1.200
15 Lalazar 6 2 6 1.000
16 British Embassy 9 1 1 4 0.444
17 MAX 9 1 3 0.333
18 Paddy Foleys 10 1 3 0.300
19 Gunma XI Stars 0 0 0 0.000
19 Serendip 0 0 0 0.000
19 Universities 0 0 0 0.000
19 Al Karam 0 0 0 0.000
19 Sri Lankan Lions 0 0 0 0.000
19 Bangladesh Tigers 0 0 0 0.000
19 Edogawa Falcons 0 0 0 0.000
19 Pakistan Eaglets 0 0 0 0.000

Rating Criteria

Going forward, the following criteria will be used for the Rating:

  1. All matches that classify as an ODI (these include the KCL matches, any other tournament matches and all reported friendly matches) will be taken into account
  2. Tournaments such as Twenty20, Six-a-side will be excluded for Rating calculation
  3. A tournament is defined as one that involves three or more teams in an ODI format
  4. Any club that has not played a minimum of 5 matches in a season will be given an Adjusted Ranking in the at the end of each season. In other words, they will be ranked below the clubs that have played 5 or more matches at the end of the season
  5. The Second Elevens match results are considered as a full result of the club. There is no separate ranking for 2nd Elevens. Basically, the ranking is for a club, not a team.